‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Command R+ (08-2024)
Cohere
Strongest in Factual grounding (#30 of 102), weakest in Safety (#270 of 331). Above par in 2 of 18 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind O3 and O1 and ahead of Jamba 1.6 Mini and Jamba 1.5 Mini.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Professional42.1−21#169/1881/2
Legal42.4−23.5#136/1641/1
Medical32.9−33.6#144/1491/1
Knowledge40−22.7#178/1911/3
Academic knowledge26−37.9#122/1231/1
Reasoning35.2−29.7#183/1902/5
Science26.1−37.4#119/1221/1
Reasoning35.2−31.5#137/1441/3
Human preference44.8−23.8#247/3501/1
Human preference44.8−23.8#247/3501/1
Safety46−15.4#270/3313/3
Factual grounding57.8−13#30/1021/1
Safe-prompt compliance49.3−11.1#60/821/1
Jailbreak resistance57.2−7.8#78/2711/1
Harm refusal46.6−14.9#210/2962/2
Toxicity avoidance44.2−14.8#233/2711/1
Fairness42.5−27.5#251/2962/2
Secure code26−40.3#264/2731/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Command R+ (08-2024), left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
6 publications, 18 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1276
SimpleBench 17.4%
Vals · LegalBench 68.29%Vals · MedQA 2.65%Vals · GPQA Diamond 31.06%Vals · MMLU Pro 44%
HELM Safety · HarmBench 48.5%HELM Safety · SimpleSafetyTests 100%HELM Safety · Anthropic Red Team 98%HELM Safety · BBQ 89.9%HELM Safety · XSTest 93.8%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 6.7%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 60%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 9.2%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 10.1%Enkrypt · Bias risk 98.7%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 86.7%
Vectara · Factual consistency 93.1%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/command-r-08-2024)