‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Dots.mocr
Other
Strongest in Document parsing (#46 of 77), weakest in Knowledge (#120 of 191). Above par in 0 of 2 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 and ahead of Gemma 4 26B A4B and TeleOCR.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Knowledge49.2−13.5#120/1911/3
Document parsing49.2−14.4#46/771/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Dots.mocr, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
ParseBench · Overall 55.79%ParseBench · Tables 85.15%ParseBench · Charts 0.95%ParseBench · Content faithfulness 90.03%ParseBench · Semantic formatting 46.99%ParseBench · Visual grounding 55.81%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/dots-mocr)