‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Muse Glimmer
Meta
Strongest in Human preference (#103 of 354), weakest in Agents (#193 of 298). Above par in 2 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Gemini 4 Carbon and Gemini 4 Argon and ahead of DeepSeek R1 and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Human preference59.1−9.7#103/3541/1
Human preference59.1−9.7#103/3541/1
Core abilities42.8−22.8#166/2001/4
General intelligence39.6−29.4#155/1801/3
Agents46.3−20#193/2982/6
Knowledge work44.1−26.6#129/2082/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Muse Glimmer, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
4 publications, 4 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1425
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 6
GDPval-AA 792
AA-Briefcase 478
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/muse-glimmer)