‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Mercury 2
Inception AI
Strongest in Secure code (#7 of 268), weakest in Agents (#252 of 298). Above par in 5 of 11 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5 and Claude Opus 5.5 and ahead of Kimi K2.6 and DeepSeek V3.2.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety49.9−11.5#177/3272/3
Secure code65.5−0.7#7/2681/1
Fairness55.3−14.7#64/2901/2
Factual grounding44−26.7#84/1041/1
Toxicity avoidance55.5−3.5#91/2661/1
Harm refusal46.4−15.1#208/2901/2
Jailbreak resistance37.3−27.7#224/2661/1
Human preference51.2−17.6#185/3541/1
Human preference51.2−17.6#185/3541/1
Agents42.9−23.4#252/2982/6
Knowledge work38.7−32#161/2082/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Mercury 2, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
5 publications, 10 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1343
GDPval-AA 502
AA-Briefcase 266
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 23.5%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 1.1%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 47.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 2.4%Enkrypt · Bias risk 69.5%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 1.3%
Vectara · Factual consistency 87.7%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/mercury-2)