‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Gemma 3 12B IT
Google · 12B · open weights
Strongest in Factual grounding (#8 of 104), weakest in Agents (#276 of 298). Above par in 7 of 12 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Sonnet 5 and ahead of Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemma 4 26B A4B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety52.2−9.2#123/3272/3
Factual grounding64.1−6.6#8/1041/1
Toxicity avoidance56.1−2.9#70/2661/1
Jailbreak resistance55.7−9.3#104/2661/1
Secure code50.8−15.4#149/2681/1
Harm refusal49.3−12.2#159/2901/2
Fairness44.2−25.8#200/2901/2
Human preference51.1−17.7#186/3541/1
Human preference51.1−17.7#186/3541/1
Agents40.8−25.5#276/2982/6
Tool use44.6−29.4#47/811/1
Knowledge work30−40.7#205/2081/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Gemma 3 12B IT, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
5 publications, 10 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1342
GDPval-AA -401
BFCL v4 30.43%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 8%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 47.2%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 9.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 2%Enkrypt · Bias risk 86.8%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 31.6%
Vectara · Factual consistency 95.6%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/gemma-3-12b-it)