‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta · 3.2B · open weights
Strongest in Tool use (#71 of 81), weakest in Human preference (#309 of 354). Above par in 3 of 10 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.2 and ahead of DeepSeek R1 and DeepSeek V3.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety48.9−12.5#207/3271/3
Harm refusal53.9−7.6#87/2901/2
Jailbreak resistance55.7−9.3#104/2661/1
Toxicity avoidance52.4−6.6#163/2661/1
Fairness42.9−27.1#235/2901/2
Secure code32.5−33.7#235/2681/1
Agents45.2−21.1#217/2981/6
Tool use38.5−35.5#71/811/1
Human preference34.3−34.5#309/3541/1
Human preference34.3−34.5#309/3541/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
LMArena Text 1167
BFCL v4 21.95%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 8%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 15%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 14.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 4.5%Enkrypt · Bias risk 88.9%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 68.9%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/llama-3-2-3b-instruct)