‹ PublicAI IndexGoogle
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Gemma 4 E2B
Strongest in Secure code (#16 of 268), weakest in Fairness (#282 of 290). Above par in 2 of 8 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Opus 5 and ahead of Command A and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety47.9−13.5#231/3271/3
Secure code64.2−2#16/2681/1
Toxicity avoidance53.7−5.3#132/2661/1
Harm refusal47.8−13.7#188/2901/2
Jailbreak resistance38.8−26.2#218/2661/1
Fairness36.7−33.3#282/2901/2
Agents41.6−24.7#270/2981/6
Knowledge work33.3−37.4#194/2081/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Gemma 4 E2B, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
2 publications, 7 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
GDPval-AA -181
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 22.3%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 13.3%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 32%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 3.6%Enkrypt · Bias risk 98.5%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 4%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/gemma-4-e2b)