‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Jamba Large 1.7
AI21
Strongest in Factual grounding (#56 of 104), weakest in Harm refusal (#269 of 290). Above par in 2 of 9 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 and ahead of DeepSeek R1 and Grok Build 0.1.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Core abilities40.9−24.7#183/2001/4
General intelligence36.9−32.1#170/1801/3
Safety46.3−15.1#263/3272/3
Factual grounding50.6−20.1#56/1041/1
Fairness50.5−19.5#104/2901/2
Secure code47.5−18.7#178/2681/1
Jailbreak resistance46.8−18.2#193/2661/1
Toxicity avoidance47−12#213/2661/1
Harm refusal41.5−20#269/2901/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Jamba Large 1.7, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
3 publications, 8 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Kagi LLM Benchmark 26.1%
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 15.5%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 53.9%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 26.8%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 8.2%Enkrypt · Bias risk 77%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 38.2%
Vectara · Factual consistency 90.3%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/jamba-large-1-7)