‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
Apertus 70B Instruct
Swiss AI · 70B
Strongest in Toxicity avoidance (#25 of 266), weakest in Secure code (#177 of 268). Above par in 4 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ahead of SeaLLM 7B V2 and Granite 4.0 H Micro.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety52.3−9.1#120/3271/3
Toxicity avoidance58.1−0.9#25/2661/1
Harm refusal53.5−8#95/2901/2
Jailbreak resistance54.9−10.1#117/2661/1
Fairness47.4−22.6#149/2901/2
Secure code47.7−18.5#177/2681/1
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for Apertus 70B Instruct, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 8.7%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 26.7%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 9.2%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 0.6%Enkrypt · Bias risk 81.9%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 37.8%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/apertus-70b-instruct)