‹ PublicAI Index
The LLM benchmark aggregator.
H2o Danube3 500M Chat
H2O.ai
Strongest in Jailbreak resistance (#169 of 266), weakest in Safety (#317 of 327). Above par in 1 of 6 scopes. Among the models it meets almost everywhere, it finishes behind Claude Sonnet 5 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ahead of Phi 2 and PowerMoE 3B.
§ 1 · Profile
What it is good at
Bars run from 50 — the average of the models each source lists — so right of the line is above par. The middle column is the gap to whoever leads that scope.
Safety40.3−21.1#317/3271/3
Jailbreak resistance51.2−13.8#169/2661/1
Toxicity avoidance33.5−25.5#246/2661/1
Harm refusal42.7−18.8#261/2901/2
Secure code26−40.2#265/2681/1
Fairness40.5−29.5#266/2901/2
§ 2 · Head to head
What it beats, and what beats it
The same models turn up scope after scope. Counted once: where both were placed, who finished higher. Bars run right for H2o Danube3 500M Chat, left for the other.
§ 3 · Sources
Where the numbers come from
1 publication, 6 figures. Every one links to the page it was read from.
Enkrypt · Jailbreak risk 11.8%Enkrypt · Harmful content risk 72.8%Enkrypt · CBRN risk 13.3%Enkrypt · Toxicity risk 17.5%Enkrypt · Bias risk 92.5%Enkrypt · Insecure code risk 93.3%
Badge
[](https://publicai.io/model-index/m/h2o-danube3-500m-chat)